Quip implementation cost: what to budget now Quip is retiring
A new Quip implementation is no longer a sensible purchase. Salesforce's own Quip product URL now lands on Slack, and Salesforce has been reported to be retiring Quip with no renewals after 1 March 2027. The cost that matters is the cost of moving off.
Platform & ArchitectureMost cost pages answer "what will this cost to implement?" For Quip in late 2026 the honest answer is that you should not be implementing it. Salesforce bought Quip in 2016, and for a decade it was the collaborative document layer for Salesforce customers: account plans, mutual close plans and qualification notes embedded on records with live Salesforce data. That chapter is ending. This page explains what can be verified about Quip's status, what Quip cost, and what moving off it will cost, because that is the budget most Quip customers now need.
Quip's status as at October 2026
Three things can be checked today.
First, the acquisition. Salesforce's acquisitions history records: "August 26, 2016: Salesforce completed its acquisition of Quip."
Second, the product's place in Salesforce's catalogue. Salesforce's own Quip product URL, salesforce.com/products/quip, now redirects to the Slack product page. Quip is no longer presented as a standalone Salesforce product.
Third, the retirement. Salesforce Ben reported on 4 March 2026 that "Salesforce has announced that all Quip products are being retired, and any subscriptions cannot be renewed after March 1, 2027." The same report says Salesforce is moving the most common Quip use cases to Slack, Agentforce Sales and the rest of the portfolio, that Quip Starter, Plus and Advanced are all affected, and that Quip sites stay fully functional until the end of each customer's subscription term. It describes a sequence after the term ends: the site goes read-only for 90 days, after which users can no longer log in. It also reports that Salesforce is building an in-product flow for converting Quip documents into Slack canvases, plus tools for exporting Quip content to other applications.
We could not read the underlying Salesforce Help article directly, so treat those dates as reported and confirm them for your own contract. Salesforce Ben points to Salesforce Help article 005299603; your account executive can confirm your own term end date, which is the date that actually governs your timeline.
What Quip cost
For reference, and for anyone still holding a renewal quote, the Quip pricing page still shows these list prices, as at October 2026:
| Quip edition | List price shown | Billing | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quip Starter | US$10 per user per month | Billed annually, or US$12 with a monthly commitment | Teams and small businesses |
| Quip Plus | US$25 per user per month | Billed annually, contact sales | Large teams; SSO, APIs and custom Live Apps |
| Quip Advanced | US$100 per user per month | Billed annually, contact sales | Real-time collaboration inside Salesforce |
The page also notes: "Starter cannot be purchased or combined with Quip for Salesforce." In practice most Salesforce customers held Quip Advanced or a Quip for Customer 360 entitlement, because the embedding inside Salesforce records was the point. That is also why their exit is more involved than exporting some documents.
The exit is the implementation
A Quip exit has the same shape as an implementation run backwards: inventory what exists, decide where each kind of content goes, move it, rebuild what cannot be moved, retrain people, and switch off. What drives cost is not the number of documents. It is how deeply Quip is wired into your Salesforce processes.
Inventory. Count documents, spreadsheets, folders and chat threads, and identify owners. More importantly, list every place Quip is embedded in Salesforce: Lightning record pages with a Quip component, templates that create a document when a record is created, live data mentions, and any Flow or Apex that creates or updates Quip documents through its APIs. Also list custom Live Apps, because those are code.
Classify. Most content falls into four groups. Living process documents such as account plans and close plans, which need a new home that people will use daily. Reference material that belongs in a knowledge base or document store. Records you must keep for compliance, which need an archive with retention rules. And dead content, which should be left behind on purpose.
Choose destinations. For process documents, the reported Salesforce path is Slack canvases and deeper Slack and Salesforce integration, with Agentforce Sales covering some selling workflows. For some teams the better answer is to move the structured part of an account plan into Salesforce fields or objects and keep the narrative in a canvas. For reference content, Salesforce Knowledge, Salesforce Files or the document platform you already run are all candidates.
Export and convert. Use whatever conversion and export tools Salesforce provides, and test them on a sample before you plan around them. Spreadsheets with formulas and live data mentions are where conversions lose fidelity. Check each template type.
Rebuild the embedded experience. This is the expensive step. A record page that used to show a live Quip account plan needs a replacement: a related canvas in a Slack channel tied to the account, fields and related lists in Salesforce, or both. Templates that auto-created documents need to become a Flow that creates the new artefact.
Re-point automation and integrations. Anything that called Quip's APIs has to be rewritten or removed. Custom Live Apps need a replacement or a decision to drop the capability.
Train and switch off. People need to know where their account plans now live. Then remove Quip components from page layouts, deactivate integrations and confirm the archive is complete before the read-only window closes.
What drives the cost up or down
The cost is lowest for a team that used Quip as a standalone document tool. Exporting documents to another platform and pointing people to the new home is a short project.
The cost rises with every Salesforce dependency. Templates tied to record creation, live data mentions in spreadsheets, record-page components and API automation each need design and build in the destination. Custom Live Apps are software and need to be redeveloped or retired.
Regulated organisations add archive work. If Quip content is part of a client record you must retain, you need an export with metadata, a retention policy in the destination and evidence that nothing was lost. That should be planned with your records manager, not discovered after the read-only window has started.
Timing is the final driver. An exit planned against your term end, with a pilot and waves, costs less than a rushed one in the last month of read-only access.
Moving Quip data into Salesforce itself
Some of what sits in Quip was always Salesforce data in disguise. An account plan template usually has a structured top half: strategic objectives, key contacts and their roles, whitespace by product, risks, next steps with owners and dates. Those are fields, related records and tasks. Keeping them in a document meant they could not be reported on, and the exit is a chance to fix that.
A Quip to Salesforce data migration for that structured part looks like any other data load. Define the target objects and fields, extract the values from each document, which is usually semi-manual because documents drift from their templates over the years, then load and reconcile. Expect to clean as you go: two plans for the same account, contacts named in a plan who no longer exist in Salesforce, and dates that were never updated.
The narrative half, the reasoning about why a deal matters and what the customer is trying to achieve, does not fit fields well. That is the part to put in a Slack canvas or a rich text area linked to the account. Splitting the two is a design decision worth a workshop, because it determines whether sales leaders can report on account plans after the move. Ask any bidder to show how they would split one of your real account plans before you accept their estimate.
A timeline that works backwards
Start from the end of your current Quip subscription term and work back. The reported sequence gives you the full term with Quip working normally, then 90 days of read-only access in which you can still export but no one can edit, then the point at which logins stop.
Aim to finish moving living documents before the term ends, because people cannot keep working in a read-only account plan. Use the read-only window only for final exports and archive checks. Working back from there, allow time for user acceptance testing of the rebuilt record pages, a pilot with one sales team, the build itself, and design. For an organisation with heavy Salesforce embedding, that sequence fills months, not weeks. If your term ends early in 2027, the planning should already be under way.
What the replacement costs
The licences you buy to replace Quip are part of the exit budget. If Slack is the destination, Slack's pricing page lists Pro at US$7.25 and Business+ at US$15 per user per month when paid annually, and Enterprise+ at US$45 per user per month, paid annually, as at October 2026. Many Quip customers already hold Slack, in which case the incremental licence cost may be nothing. If you are moving reference content into Salesforce Knowledge or Files, check your edition's entitlements and file storage before assuming it is free.
Compare like with like. A team on Quip Advanced at US$100 per user per month that moves to Slack Business+ at US$15 may reduce its licence bill, but only if the Salesforce-side rebuild delivers what the embedded documents used to do.
Getting comparable quotes
Give bidders your inventory rather than asking them to discover it at your expense. At minimum: user count and edition, document and template counts by type, a list of record pages with Quip components, any APIs or Live Apps in use, compliance retention rules, the chosen destinations and your term end date. Ask for the quote by work package.
| Work package | What the quote should state |
|---|---|
| Inventory and classification | Method, tools and who signs off the classification |
| Destination design | Where each content type goes, with examples |
| Export and conversion | Tools used, sample test results, fidelity issues |
| Salesforce rebuild | Each record page and template, and its replacement |
| Automation and Live Apps | Each integration, rebuilt or retired |
| Archive and decommission | Retention evidence and switch-off steps |
What quotes leave out
Overlap. Quip and the replacement run side by side for the length of the migration. Budget both licences for that period.
Archive storage. Retained exports need storage with retention controls, which may be a new cost.
Owner time. Only the people who wrote an account plan know which parts still matter. Their review time is a real cost, and it is usually not in the partner's quote.
Change management. Sales teams that lived in Quip account plans will resist a new layout. Plan champions and short sessions per team.
Links that break. Quip links are pasted into emails, Chatter posts, Salesforce text fields, Slack messages and other documents. After the switch-off they lead nowhere. A cheap mitigation is to export a register of old document links with their new locations, and to search Salesforce text fields for Quip URLs so the most important ones can be replaced. Nobody prices this, and everybody notices it a month after go-live.
Permissions. Quip sharing rarely mirrors Salesforce sharing. When content moves into Salesforce or a Slack channel, the people who can see it may change. Review sensitive documents, such as pricing strategy or HR material, before they land somewhere wider.
Where to go next
For what Quip was and how it sat inside Salesforce, read Quip with Salesforce. The licence and renewal detail is on the Quip licence cost page, and the existing connection points on integrating Quip with Salesforce. The move itself is covered on should I migrate from Quip, the history on what happened to Quip, and choosing help on hiring a Quip partner.



