# Should I migrate from Regrello Regrello does not replace every Flow. Do not migrate every Flow into Regrello, and do not migrate Regrello by deleting Flow. **Published:** 2026-06-24 **Canonical:** https://synconai.com/should-i-migrate-from-regrello **Author:** SynconAI Architecture Team ## In short Salesforce completed the Regrello acquisition on 1 October 2025. Regrello automates complex processes. It does not replace every Flow. A Flow already runs a path you configured, including a fixed rule with one right output. Do not migrate every Flow into Regrello, and do not migrate by deleting Flow. This page states no price, no screen, and no end date. ## Sources - **Salesforce Signs Definitive Agreement to Acquire Regrello** (retrieved 2025-10-01) https://www.salesforce.com/news/stories/salesforce-signs-definitive-agreement-to-acquire-regrello/ > Salesforce completed its acquisition of Regrello on October 1, 2025. ## What to take away - Regrello does not replace every Flow. The close was 1 October 2025. - A Flow already runs a configured path. A fixed rule stays there. - Do not migrate every Flow into Regrello, and do not migrate Regrello by deleting Flow. - Alternatives sit unranked. This page invents no AppExchange listing, price, or shutdown date. ## The guide An architect exports every Flow in the org, highlights the list, and asks which ones the migration will retire. The highlight is the mistake. Most of those Flows exist because a step must come out the same way every time. A discount band. A field update from a rule finance already signed. An assignment from a matrix. Regrello automates complex processes. A complex process is not a synonym for every automation you have. Migrating by emptying the Flow list adds a sentence the close did not contain. The only sentence this page quotes from the announcement is the completion line. "Salesforce completed its acquisition of Regrello on October 1, 2025." ## Should you migrate Migrate a process you can still find in inboxes, side chats, and a spreadsheet, because the path crosses too many teams for one Flow to be honest about it. Name the teams. Name the systems that must be written. Name where it stalls. "Vendor onboarding" can be that process if you can say those things. "All operations" cannot. Do not migrate because the acquisition completed. The completion date is 1 October 2025. The cited page does not publish a shutdown date for Flow, or for Regrello. You are not required to retire either. Stay with the Flows that already do a fixed job. Spend the decision on the process that still has no single owner. ## Do not empty Flow, and do not pour Flow in Two moves are refused here. The first is migrating every Flow into Regrello, as if a longer list were a design. A Flow that updates a field from a table does not become more correct because a process tool restates the table in prose. The second copy will be the one nobody updates. The second refusal is migrating Regrello by deleting Flow. Deleting the inventory is not a cutover. It is how a tested discount disappears the week the new layer is late. Keep the call. A process may collect quantity and product. It may start the Flow. It may not keep a second discount band in a message. If a new starter with the written rule would be wrong to produce a different output, the step is fixed, and it stays in Flow. ## What the software is now Salesforce owns Regrello. The completion date is 1 October 2025. What the software is now is automation for complex processes. The implementation notes on this site record a plan to integrate that work with Agentforce and Slack. That plan is not a screen, and this page will not draw one. It is also not an instruction to delete Flow. The cited page does not publish a price. Agentforce and Slack, if you use them, are on your contract or they are not. This page will not assume they are free. ## The three pages This page answers whether you should migrate, what the software is now, how a process compares with native Flow, and which alternatives sit unranked. The implementation page is [Regrello, Agentforce, and Slack](/regrello-agentforce). Use it to mark each step as Flow, person, or the process layer. The what-happened page is [What happened to Regrello](/what-happened-to-regrello). Use it for ownership, the date, the blank price, and the absent end date. The integration page is [Integrating Regrello with Salesforce](/integrating-regrello-with-salesforce). Use it when a message may start work, and when a message must not. A Slack thread is not the system of record for a discount. The record is still the record. ## Versus the Flow you already run A Flow already runs a path you configured. It can start when a record changes, when a schedule fires, or when a person presses a button. It can branch on a field. It can update a record, call an action you named, and stop. You can test it. You can see the version. A colleague can open the path and say whether the discount band is the one finance signed. That is the native automation object. It already answers how a fixed step produces one right output. Only after that description does a comparison count. Regrello is for a process that still needs people and more than one system, including a stall where two careful people have to talk. It does not replace every Flow. A step with one right output stays where the test already lives. The agent, if you use one, may start the Flow. The agent does not re-own the band. Slack may carry a message that asks a person to act. If agreement matters, the agreement lands on a record, and the chat points at it. Write the comparison as marks on a list, not as a platform swap. For each step: Flow, person, or the process layer. A step with no mark is not ready to migrate. "Retire automation" is not a mark. ## What you must not move Do not migrate every Flow into Regrello. Exporting the list is not scope. Do not migrate Regrello by deleting Flow. The way back, if a pilot stalls, includes the Flow you did not delete. Do not let a message create a record from any emoji in any channel. Which channel may start work is a write. Which channel is only conversation is not. Say so before you migrate. Exceptions are the process. The happy path is usually short and already partly in Flow. Put the timeout in the scope: who is asked, what they need, how long they have, and what happens if they do not answer. A timeout that retries forever is not a design. A timeout that assigns a person, with the facts attached, is a design. ## Alternatives, without a rank People search for alternatives after the acquisition, and for an alternative on AppExchange. This page has not been shown an AppExchange listing. It will not invent a listing, a rating, or a rank. One way is to leave the Flow inventory where it is and not adopt a process layer this quarter. Another way is to move one named process, calling Flow for the fixed steps and leaving those Flows in place. Another way is to keep a process in the inbox it already occupies, with a named owner, because you cannot yet mark the steps. Another way is to evaluate a different process tool on your own criteria. None of these is placed first. The gate is whether you can mark steps, and whether anyone has proposed deletion as the migration. Deletion fails the gate. ## A walkthrough you can finish on paper Write the process in one sentence a frontline person would accept. List the steps in order. Mark each one. Name the system that owns each fact, so you do not write the same fact to two systems and hope. Name the Slack channel that may start work, if any, and the channels that may not. Name the timeout. Write that no Flow will be deleted as part of this move. Stop on a blank mark. Take the marked list to the implementation page. Leave price and shutdown on the what-happened page. Take the rule about messages that write records to the integration page. If a proposal opens with a count of Flows to retire, stop reading the fee. ## After the first process Judge the pilot by the stall, not by a diagram of the happy path. Who was asked. Whether the facts were attached. Whether a missing answer assigned a person or looped. Whether the Flow you called still holds the only copy of the fixed rule. If a second copy appeared in a prompt or a chat, delete the copy, not the Flow. Add a second process only when the first marks are still true a fortnight later. A pack goes wrong when the Flow export is the backlog, a price is typed for "replacing automation", and a quarter is chosen to switch Flow off. Strip it back. One process. Marks on the steps. Flow still there. No price. No end date. No screen. ## The people the process still needs A migration that prices only a build will assume approvers are free. They are not. The person who signs a supplier exception has to say whether the message contains the fact they need. The person who owns the discount Flow has to confirm the process calls that Flow and does not restate the band. The person who administers Slack has to say which channel may start work. Put those hours on the decision. If those people cannot attend, keep the process in the inbox. Attendance is a gate, the same way a marked step is a gate. Name the systems the process crosses. The contract store. The finance system. The org you already run. Say what each one owns. A process that writes the same fact to two places will drift. Pick the owner. The other system receives a copy, or it does not. A copy needs a direction and a failure you can see. An invisible sync is how the stall returns, a week later, as an argument about which number was real. Agentforce, where your contract includes it, may start the process or answer where a step sits. That is not a reason to delete the Flow being called. If the contract does not include Agentforce, or does not include Slack, do not assume the acquisition added them. A plan that marks both as included because a sentence mentioned them has invented a licence. Open the agreement or leave the cell blank. A blank licence line is a question. A guessed product is a cost you did not choose. Count the Flows you will call, not the Flows you will retire. A pilot that calls two Flows and leaves the other two hundred untouched is a success if the stall has an owner. A pilot that deletes twenty Flows and calls none has not migrated Regrello. It has removed tests you may need next month. Write the names of the Flows the process may start. If a name cannot be found in the org, it is not a dependency. It is a memory. Memories are how a second copy of a rule gets built beside the real one. ::: warn Do not migrate every Flow into Regrello, and do not migrate Regrello by deleting Flow. A fixed rule stays in Flow. The close was 1 October 2025. This page gives no price, no screen, and no end date. ::: | Decision | You may proceed when | Stop when | | --- | --- | --- | | Migrate this process | Steps are marked Flow, person, or process layer | The brief is every Flow in the org | | Fixed rule | The Flow remains the only copy | A second band lives in a prompt or a chat | | Deletion | No Flow is removed as the cutover | The migration is a retirement list | | Native comparison | You have said what a Flow already runs | The comparison is two logos | | Alternative | The ways sit unranked | An AppExchange listing or a rank was invented | | Price and end date | Both cells are blank | A figure or a quarter was typed to fill a template | Bring the table to the meeting. If the first row is the whole export, you are not migrating a process. You are threatening the automations that already work. The implementation page can price a marked process. It cannot price a deleted inventory. ## Questions ### Should I migrate from Regrello to Salesforce? Migrate one complex process you can mark step by step. Salesforce completed the acquisition on 1 October 2025. Regrello does not replace every Flow. Do not move the Flow inventory across, and do not delete Flow as the cutover. This page states no price and no shutdown date. ### What is Regrello software now? Regrello automates complex processes. Salesforce owns it after 1 October 2025. It is not a replacement for every Flow, and this page does not describe a current screen or an end date. Fixed rules stay in Flow. The cited page does not publish a price. ### How does Regrello compare with Salesforce Flow? A Flow already runs a path you configured. It can branch, update a record, call an action, and stop, and you can test that path. Use it for a step with one right output. Regrello is for a process that still stalls across people and systems. It does not replace the Flow that already holds the rule. ### What are the alternatives after the Regrello acquisition? This page does not rank alternatives and has not been shown an AppExchange listing. Ways that sit side by side include leaving Flow as it is, moving one marked process while keeping Flow, leaving the work in its current inbox with an owner, or evaluating another process tool yourself. ### Should we delete Flow to finish the Regrello migration? No. Do not migrate Regrello by deleting Flow, and do not migrate every Flow into Regrello. A fixed step stays in Flow. The process may call it. A second copy of the rule in a chat or a prompt will be the copy nobody maintains. --- SynconAI is a Salesforce Select Partner and an OpenAI Select Partner, delivering architect-led Salesforce and AI programmes across the United States and Australia. Related service: Agentforce consulting (https://synconai.com/salesforce-agentforce-consulting).